Taylorism Paper Essay Example for Free

Taylorism Paper EssayThe American Frederick W. Taylor (18561915) pioneered the scientific management approach to crap organization, wherefore the term Taylorism. Taylor developed his ideas on organise organization while working as superintendent at the Midvale Steel Company in Pennsylvania, USA. Taylorism represents both a set of management practices and a system of ideological assumptions. The autonomy (freedom from control) of craft workers was potentially a threat to managerial control. For the craft worker, the exercise of control over work practices was closely linked to his personality, as this description of craft pride, taken from the trade ledger Machinery in 1915, suggestsAs a first-line manager, Taylor not surprisingly loted the position of skilled shop-floor workers differently. He was appalled by what he regarded as inefficient working practices and the tendency of his subordinates not to put in a honest days work, what Taylor called natural soldiering.He be lieved that workers who did manual work were motivated solely by money the image of the greedy robot and were too stupid to develop the most efficient government agency of performing a assess the one best way. The role of management was to analyse scientifically all the tasks to be undertaken, and then to design jobs to eliminate date and motion waste. Taylors approach to work organization and employment relations was based on the following five principles maximum job atomizationseparate planning and doingseparate direct and indirect laboura minimization of skill requirementsa minimization of handling component parts and material. The centrepiece of scientific management is the separation of tasks into their simplest constituent elements routinization of work (the first principle). Most manual workers were viewed as sinful and stupid, and therefore all decision-making functions had to be removed from their detainment (the second principle). All prepa-ration and servicing tas ks should be taken away from the skilled worker (direct labour), and, drawing on Charles Babbages principle, performed by unskilled and cheaper labour (indirect labour, in the third principle).Minimizing the skill requirements to perform a task would reduce the workers control over work activities or the labour process (the fourth part principle). Finally, management should ensure that the layout of the machines on the factory floor minimized the movement of people and materials to shorten the time taken (the fifth principle).While the logic of work fragmentation and routinization is simple and compelling, the principles of Taylorism reflect the class antagonism that is fix in employment relations.When Taylors principles were applied to work organization, they led to the intensification of work to speeding up, deskilling and current techniques to control workers, as shown in Figure 3.2. And since gender, as we have dis-cussed, is both a system of sort and a structure of power re lations, it should not surprise us that Taylorism contributed to the shift in the gender study of engineering firms. As millions of men were recruited into the armed forces for the First World War (191418), job fragmentation and the occupation of standardized items such as rifles, guns and munitions enabled women dilutees to be employed in what had previously been skilled jobs reserved solo for men.Some writers argue that Taylorism was a relatively short-lived phenomenon, which died in the economic depression of the 1930s. However, others have argued that this view underestimates the spread and influence of Taylors principles the popular notion that Taylorism has been superseded by later schools of human relations, that it failed represents a woeful misreading of the actual dynamics of the development of management. Similarly, others have made a coaxing case that, In general the direct and indirect influence of Taylorism on factory jobs has been extensive, so that in Britain jo b design and technology design have become imbued with neo-Taylorism (ref. 10, p. 73).